Crossing the Highway

Just another WordPress.com weblog

a “Thank You” for my mothers June 27, 2008

i am the classic woman of gen-X who grew up thinking that feminism had done all it needed to do, mostly because i didn’t directly experience noticeable misogyny. yes, i had been cat-called and felt ashamed at not having a date for a dance, but, on the whole, i was respected as a person and allowed to do what i wanted, regardless of my genitals.

as i read more and more in the feminist blogosphere, i realize just how much of that freedom was due to my mother and grandmothers, my aunt and godmother, and so many other strong women i encountered growing up. i was lucky in a lot of ways. i liked being rowdy and playing “boys’ games”, but i also liked dressing up and being “girly”, so i was able to fit in when i needed to, without too much effort. i had a mind made for philosophy, science, and politics, but i also have a deep seeded love of gossip and fashion. what amazes me, in retrospect, is how much these women encouraged the exploration of my less “feminine” interests. i had dolls out the wazoo and one of those fake kitchens, but i also had legos, tinker toys, matchbox cars, tools, a baseball set, a basketball hoop, and lord knows what else. when i went to school, i was in honors classes where the boy/girl ratio was heavy on the girls for most of my years there. the 2 smartest people i knew (judging by grades, at least) were girls, and the boys were busy fighting for the #3 spot.

one thing i can attribute this to is having a family full of teachers. i can’t even count the number of people in my family who are/were teachers, counselors, administrators, and any number of other positions in the public school system. i have to assume that this alone helped to encourage a love of learning, whatever the subject matter. my home was filled with encyclopedias and books and we played games like trivial pursuit. my mother encouraged me to have a book in my hands at all times.

i also had 2 divorced grandmothers. that doesn’t sound so great on the surface, but it meant that i had two matriarchs in the family who knew exactly what it took to be a woman in charge of her own life and making a good life for her family. they raised my parents to respect that and expect no less of themselves and of me. there was no room for a shrinking violet in our family. you had to speak up for yourself and do for yourself or it wasn’t getting done. when my grandmother’s roof needed replacing and there wasn’t any money for it, my mother got up at 3am every morning all summer to get over there and do it herself. if i’d been old enough, i’m sure i would have been up there helping her.

i had amazing examples of strong women around me for my whole life. there were few men, but the ones who stayed around were equally supportive and strong. i never heard anyone in my family/godfamily say that i couldn’t or shouldn’t do something based on my gender or the sex-appropriateness of it (aside from all the times my mother had to remind me to keep my knees together when wearing a skirt, but really, i think that one’s okay). the closest i could say i ever came to someone pressuring me to do something “girly” was my mother desperately wanting me to learn cooking and sewing. i honestly believe, though, that a) she truly enjoyed these activities and b) she recognized the practical aspect of being able to do these things for yourself. after all, it’s how our family had survived and thrived for so many generations.

so, here i am, almost 30 years later, and i get it. i can see how their hard work and pressure to succeed without sacrificing my spirit was such an amazing gift. i can’t imagine how i would have survived without the lessons they taught me and continue to teach me. i am grateful beyond mere words.

my mother, age 2

my mother, age 2

 

12 reasons Clinton Supporters don’t want to fall in line June 23, 2008

Filed under: Active-Isms, politics — infamousqbert @ 1:01 pm
Tags: , , , ,

Rebecca Traister has a nice post up at Salon.com about why Clinton supporters are still kicking and screaming, despite all the wonderful demands that they just suck it up and join the party.

Exactly. These angry people have nowhere else to go. So the safe expectation is that they will fall in line without much kicking and screaming. And that, ultimately, is why many of them are kicking and screaming. Yes, they’re going to vote for Obama. Of course they’ll vote for him. The truth is, they’ll probably love voting for him. But after what they feel has been done to them — the way in which they were written off, marginalized and resented, their hopes mocked and their history-making ambitions dismissed as retrograde identity politicking — damned if they’re going to be nice girls about it.

http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2008/06/23/pumas/index.html

 

i think i’ve been poisoned June 21, 2008

Filed under: life in general, minutiae — infamousqbert @ 4:46 pm
Tags: , , , ,

no, seriously. i mean, not super seriously, but i’m not just making this up.

our story starts with me being a dumbass who needs to learn how to recognize plants when they don’t have those little plastic tags on them like you see at the store. so, d & i are coming out of blockbuster this morning and we’re parked right in front of this beautiful wild flowering plant. it’s all great pokey green leaves and bright pink flowers. i’m feeling sweet, so i go grab a hold of one of the blooms and bend it to break it off. all of a sudden, from inside the car i hear, “THAT’S OLEANDER!!!”

my response is a quick and snarky one, “Well, I’m not gonna eat it!”

fast-forward 20 minutes to us in the parking lot of the home depot. i take a sip of my coffee and feel a hair or something on my tongue. now picture, in slow motion, if you will, the same hand that picked the oleander, going toward my mouth to pick said hair off of my tongue. in doing so, i get something bitter on my tongue. without thinking, i just take another sip of coffee. it slowly dawns on me what that bitter something was.

“Honey, just how poisonous is oleander?”
“I don’t know. I mean, there was that movie, with Michelle Pfeiffer–”
“I know, and she made tea and someone died. But, like, how much does it take?”
“Why??”
“Um, I might have gotten some of the sap on my tongue…”

So, here we are, several hours later, and I have a pretty nasty case of gas/stomach pain. All research (meaning what wikipedia tells us) says that fatal/extreme poisoning is very obvious very quickly. So, in all likelihood, I’m fine. Just a dumbass. But still, now you can say you know someone who got oleander poisoning. Just leave out the part where I did it to myself, please.

 

Abstinence + Real Facts? Who are these people? June 16, 2008

Filed under: Active-Isms, politics — infamousqbert @ 5:32 pm
Tags: , , , , , ,

i downloaded this thinking it would be the typical christian-right (not to be confused with respectable Christianity) tripe. I was very surprised to find a Q&A section that actually laid out the basic facts of contraceptions. Yes, they’re pushing abstinence, which they have every right to do. But they’re doing it the right way and giving their audience some real info about why they think contraception isn’t their best choice.

Just for Girls/Just for Guys

you can download the whole magazine for free which, again, i think is pretty cool. not making money on your teen audience? that’s, sadly, shocking nowadays.

 

Women are “low hanging fruit” for the Dems June 13, 2008

Whether you think this is an issue with the party, politics in general, or just an issue with our media, it’s still worth watching and reading about. There needs to be an outcry of women, and men, demanding that the politicos stop treating us like children. You can’t win our votes by threatening us, not even with something as major as Roe v Wade. There are many other reasons why women vote and Washington needs to learn that. They need to actually work for our votes and suffer the consequences if they don’t.

If you feel like it, here are the feedback addresses for MSNBC and Hardball. Chris Matthew’s shouldn’t be allowed to open his mouth in my opinion, but they need to hear that from more than just me.
letters@msnbc.com
phil.griffin@nbc.com
hardball@msnbc.com
chuck.todd@nbcuni.com
steve.capus@nbc.com

CHUCK TODD: … So, I think when you look at this, and our experts, our pollsters said, boy they would worry about the suburban women thing. If they were Obama they’d worry about the suburban women thing first, before the men. They say, you know what? Hey, Bush won men by this much; you can still win it by losing men by that much. I’d argue and say if he slices men from 20 to 15, and you assume those women come home, then that’s how he wins a big win. And he forces McCain to play defense.CHRIS MATTHEWS: But in a political [unintelligible], women are low-hanging fruit, though, in the terms of politics.

MATTHEWS: You can reach up and say, “I’m pro-choice, he’s not.”

TODD: Correct.

 

read it June 11, 2008

Filed under: Active-Isms — infamousqbert @ 5:25 pm
Tags: , , , ,

reasons why everyone should write, talk, and communicate in any other way about their own rape stories. don’t let anyone tell you it’s your fault or that you don’t have a right to tell them because you should be embarrassed or ashamed. they should be ashamed to be that unsupportive.

trigger warning:

Don’t Write a Poem About Rape

 

a different perspective June 11, 2008

Filed under: Active-Isms — infamousqbert @ 10:26 am
Tags: , , , , , ,

i’m a self-proclaimed sex & the city disliker. i tried to watch it early on, but could never get into it. i didn’t relate to the characters and thought their lives seemed ridiculous and shallow. i never understood why so many of my friends got into it, other than the general reason that the mass of our country doesn’t think very critically about their entertainment.

so, i was actually quite pleased to read this post on shakesville. it gave me a bit of insight and some newfound respect for the show. it’s still highly unlikely that i’ll ever watch the show or the movie, but at least i don’t feel quite so “what the poop?” about people who do.

to see female characters on TV who weren’t automatically satisfied by any guy who gave them the time of day and weren’t afraid to keep looking, who weren’t sure they wanted to get married, and who weren’t sure they wanted to have babies—in short to find characters who think like many women actually think about relationships, marriage and babies—was immensely appealing to many women. And what was even more appealing was that despite their equivocation about traditional gender roles they were still into ‘girly stuff’—the shoes, fashion, gossip, relationships—a charactersiation which disrupts the pervasive cultural casting of women as either feminine self-effacing manlovers or unfeminine selfish manhaters. Sex and the City highlights the fact that straight women can actually value their own sense of self and love men—all at once! (emphasis mine)

 

i guess it’s a good thing i was born in the ’70s June 10, 2008

Filed under: Active-Isms, minutiae, politics — infamousqbert @ 9:59 am
Tags: , , , , ,

thank god i don’t squeeze the toothpaste at the top!

25

As a 1930s wife, I am
Poor

Take the test!

 

Vulvodynia June 5, 2008

Filed under: Active-Isms, politics — infamousqbert @ 2:53 pm
Tags: , , , , ,

it sounds like a small island nation, or possibly a superhero name, but it’s actually the cause of extreme, often misdiagnosed pain for 1 in 6 vagina holding women. feministing has a good article on it with the very pressing quandary:

Imagine, by contrast, how the medical community would approach a disorder that made any friction unbearably painful for one in six penises.

 

conflicting thoughts June 4, 2008

so, d & i stand on different sides of the fence concerning the democratic nomination. we’re both hillary supporters, but our opinions on what to do now are definitely not the same.

the gist of our disagreement goes like this:

d: i just can’t vote for obama. i’m not voting for mccain, but i’m not voting for obama, either.

b: i get how you’re feeling, but i worry about how many other people will do the same.

d thinks this is very condescending on my part, which i don’t see, but i do feel badly that i hurt her feelings. so, this post is an attempt to sort out the disagreement in my head and try to understand her side. please forgive me it’s a bit rambly.

first, a BIG part of this is simply my approach to many matters. i know that this isn’t a universal for me and that i contradict myself often enough, but i tend toward not dwelling on issues when i recognize that there’s nothing i can do to change it. i dwell for a LOOOOOONG time if i think there’s something i have control over. but on these bigger items, i just don’t. so, while i respect the folks who need a few days to absorb and vent, it’s just not the way i handle things. and, more than once, this has made me come across as cold and/or arrogant. i don’t mean to be. it’s just my way of defending my heart. please believe that i’m thisclose to crying about hillary right now. when i think about how close we came and all the bullshit misogynistic hypocrisy that was thrown at her, it makes me crazy. which is why i can’t let myself think too much about it. i have to move on, and my instinct is to demand that others do so as well, so that their dwelling doesn’t interfere with my defense. i want to find something i can control, or at least affect, and start focusing on that. in this case, it’s working as hard as i can to keep mccain out of the white house, and the best way i see to do that is to get obama in.

so, now i’m trying to better understand d’s state of mind, which leans toward the couple of days of venting before making a decision. it’s hard for me to understand that she might legitimately not know what she’s going to do. i knew months ago what my plans were, and my brain keeps saying “of course she knows! she’s just being stubborn!”. and i do get that that’s condescending, so i’m trying hard to keep it at bay.

mostly, i’m scared. i think obama can win if the democratic party pulls together behind him. a few months ago, i thought that was inevitable. but, in the last month, i’ve watched the mass of his supporters get more and more arrogant and condescending and the mass of her supporters get more and more bitter and entrenched, neither of which bodes well for creating a unified party. my words were very precise when i said i was worried about how many people would leave the party and either vote for mccain or not vote for obama. i’m worried about the party and the future of the country. i’m worried that, if a true 3rd party appears and is strong enough to stick around, it will be, essentially, another liberal group, leaving the republicans stronger than ever. 2 half parties doesn’t equal anything strong enough to beat a whole party.

my idealism is cracking, which is also scary. i’m not the naive 18 year old i once was. i’ve seen a lot of the sheen drop off the world in the last 10 or so years. but i’ve worked REALLY hard to see the good under the sheen, the strong foundations without the gilding. i want to see the truth, but i really don’t want that truth to be shoddy construction on a cracked foundation. forgive the metaphor, but it’s the only way i can think to put it.

i guess i’m just asking for as many people as possible to help me prove that it’s not as bad as it seems right now. if there are cracks in the foundation, this is our chance to repair them. this is our chance to come together and prove that we can see past our differences and use the tools we have, rather than complaining, like we did in 2004, about getting an empty toolbox. again with the metaphors, i know. i think i’ll stop now. thanks for listening.